Integrating Weighted Delay Index (WDI) with Dynamic Critical Path Analysis for Enhanced Delay Assessment in Construction Projects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61186/JCER.8.1.47

Keywords:

Construction project delays, Weighted Delay Index (WDI), Dynamic Critical Path Method, Extension of Time (EOT) methods, Delays

Abstract

Project delay remains one of the most persistent challenges in construction management, often leading to significant cost overruns, contractual disputes, and stakeholder dissatisfaction. Traditional scheduling and delay analysis methods—such as Critical Path Method (CPM), Earned Value Management (EVM), and conventional Extension of Time (EOT) techniques—tend to overlook the relative importance of activities and the dynamic nature of project execution. This study introduces the Weighted Delay Index (WDI), a novel metric that integrates activity-specific weights with dynamic critical path analysis to provide a more nuanced evaluation of delay severity. Activity weights are derived through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), incorporating four key dimensions: time, cost, risk, and technical impact. The methodology is validated through multiple case studies of construction projects, where WDI trends are compared against actual project delays determined via Time Impact Analysis. Results indicate that Project Duration is the dominant predictor of overall delays, while WDI offers significant diagnostic and managerial value by identifying critical activities whose delays disproportionately affect project performance. Workforce Intensity is found to moderate delay outcomes, with higher intensity generally reducing delay severity. The proposed framework provides project managers with an early-warning and prioritization tool, enabling targeted intervention strategies that go beyond aggregated delay measures. The study contributes to both theory and practice by bridging the gap between deterministic scheduling and dynamic, activity-sensitive delay analysis.

References

[1] Long, L. D., & Ohsato, A. (2009). A genetic algorithm-based method for scheduling repetitive construction projects. Automation in Construction, 18(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.11.005

[2] Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., & Anbari, F. (2009). Prediction of project outcome: The application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.009

[3] Khamooshi, H., & Cioffi, D. F. (2013). Uncertainty in task duration and cost estimates: Fusion of probabilistic forecasts and deterministic scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(5), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000616

[4] Vanhoucke, M. (2013). Project management with dynamic scheduling (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40438-2

[5] Sophie, E. R. (2025, July). Schedule performance analysis using EVM and Critical Path Method (CPM).

[6] Purushothaman, M. B., Evans, D. A., & Ghisi, A. G. (2025). Dynamic scheduling: Influential and influenced factors and their interrelationships in the New Zealand construction industry. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-12-2024-0521

[7] Maravas, A., & Pantouvakis, J.-P. (2025). Schedula Anima: Dynamic visualization of Gantt charts and resource usage graphs in project scheduling. Buildings, 15(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030393

[8] Kim, K. (2020). Generalized resource-constrained critical path method to improve sustainability in construction project scheduling. Sustainability, 12(21), 8918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218918

[9] Chaudhary, A., & Meshram, S. (2025). Comparison of various techniques for project scheduling under resource constraints. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 73(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I2P106

[10] Gondia, A. S., Siam, A., El-Dakhakhni, W., & Nassar, A. H. (2020). Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(1), 04019085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001736

[11] Çevikbaş, M., Okudan, O., & Işık, Z. (2022). New delay-analysis method using modified schedule and modified updated schedule for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(11), 04022122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002391

[12] Bektas, S., Birgonul, M. T., & Dikmen, I. (2021). Integrated probabilistic delay analysis method to estimate expected outcome of construction delay disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13(1), 04520037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000439

[13] Alsulamy, S. (2025). Predicting construction delay risks in Saudi Arabian projects: A comparative analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LGBM. Expert Systems with Applications, 268, 126279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126279

[14] Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., Tribaldos, E., & Harris, F. (1995). Computer aided construction delay analysis and claims preparation. Construction Management and Economics, 13(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199500000039

[15] Kim, K., Han, B., Park, M., Kim, K., & Kim, E. (2022). Application issues of impacted as-planned schedule for delay analysis. Buildings, 12(9), 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091442

[16] Yousri, E., Sayed, A. E. B., Abdelalim, A. M., & Farag, M. A. M. (2024). A combined method of collapsed as-built and impact as planned delay analysis methods for construction projects. Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends, 43(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaet.2023.238517.1263

[17] Hegazy, T., Elbeltagi, E., & Zhang, K. (2005). Keeping better site records using intelligent bar charts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(5), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:5(513)

[18] Kim, Y., Kim, K., & Shin, D. (2005). Delay analysis method using delay section. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1155)

[19] Asgharinia, M. (2025). Methodology for evaluating and optimizing the selection of concrete structure demolition methods based on cost, time, and quality (safety). Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 7(2), 76–98.

[20] Pink, M. (2022, September). Studying critical path delay and recovery. SmartPM. https://smartpm.com/blog/critical-path-delay-and-recovery.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Integrating Weighted Delay Index (WDI) with Dynamic Critical Path Analysis for Enhanced Delay Assessment in Construction Projects. (2026). Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.61186/JCER.8.1.47

Most read articles by the same author(s)